Thread:Feedback/Suggestions

Site looks pretty good. Still a bit cluttered/confusing.
 * "Bump this thread" is not common language, and most users won't know what it means.
 * Why not consolidate the two disclaimers about creative commons licensing and 'writing to be edited and distributed at will'?
 * No need for both the 'Link to' text and a link to icon
 * All of the items in the 'more' menu could be easily incorporated into the interface; more menus should be for infrequently used items, not edit!
 * 'Change subject' is both ambiguous and unnecessary. First, it could mean 'switch threads' instead of 'rename thread', which is what is intended.  Second, it is best accomplished on the edit page, so isn't really needed on every single post.
 * Why not just "reply" instead of "add a reply"; isn't the 'add a' implied
 * More prominent, 'start a new discussion'. Suggest rephrasing to just, "+ New Post"  Shouldn't be on the same line as the search bar, consider top of the page.
 * Drag to new location is not working (IE8 on Windows 7)
 * After saving edits, browser does not return to edited post (goes to top of page instead). Is that because "bump this thread" is selected?  If so, browser should know to follow.
 * Visually ambiguous that the more menu is for the intended post rather than the one beneath it (particularly because of the visual signal of the down arrow. Suggest putting 'Link to' and 'More on the top bar (where history-summarize-change subject is now), and moving 'summarize' and 'change subject' to inside the more menu
 * Visual design of thread dividers is a bit unsuccessful. Lines are both too thin and too prominent in the curves at the lower left corner.  I think it draws attention to the bottom of the post.