Thread:Feedback/Stopping bad signatures?

In true wiki style it is easily possible to change the layout of any page. E.g. it would be easy to add a comment including a large &lt;div> effectively blanking the whole page. This I guess is acceptable since it's just as easy to do that today. It's easy to see who added the blank, remove it and block that user.

Now on the other hand it's easy to change your signature after you've discussed something. So nobody will be able to see it's me, just by watching recent changes or the thread history. And if I change my signature to exclude my own name you'll have an even harder time identifying who's behind the blanking at all. Of course it *is* possible to find out, but a lot harder.

And what if I'm active in lots of threads, and so I'll instantly render 50 talk pages useless. How is an admin going to stop me? By deleting all my posts? It could easily be many 100s.

E.g. now you can see part of my signature on the top of this page in gray. It felt better than blanking the page... (now it's reset, so you can't see it) Should admins be able to reset users' signatures and block them from changing their signature? I'll remove it in a while, when you've seen my point.